
I need your help on this one.
Please (please please) tell me that Washington DC is the most far-left city in America. I know that it’s not as immediate a choice as Chicago, New York or San Francisco, but it is bordered by Maryland and northern Virginia, two liberal enclaves whose residents pour into and out of DC every day, and it is the lair of the federal government and all those who worship at that false idol’s altar.
That and the fact that 97 percent (!) of DC voters went for Barry last November.
So, needless to say, that when I go out in DC it’s very frequently with liberals. I’ve learned not to bring up politics too often myself, partly because I don’t want to humiliate liberals who think that Obama is so wonderful, quote because-even-Europe-loves-him unquote, and partly because I don’t want to incur my wife’s wrath.
But when other people raise the issue, then it’s fair game.
Recently, I’ve had the pleasure of hanging out with a member of the AFL-CIO, a proletariat at Al Gore’s climate hysteria NGO (I can’t remember what it’s called and am not going to waste any time searching for its name) and an aide to a certain well-known and much-despised – by both sides – member of the Senate.
And this friend – for he is a good guy and a good friend – went on the quick-boil when I told him that the town hall meetings are, in my opinion, spontaneous outpourings of individual anger. Nonsense, he replied, they’re all organized by Hannity, Limbaugh, etc.
While saying this, he denied that Democrats are the masters of this dark art. Hello Code Pink, ACORN, MoveOn.org, George Soros, Greenpeace, AFL-CIO, UAW, Teamsters, SEIU, etc? He was particularly aggrieved by the frequently uncivil nature of the town halls, but wouldn’t concede that this is how Democrats act every time that a Republican president is elected. He denounced those carrying Obama/Hitler signs (who we know were Democratic/Lyndon LaRouche plants) and denied that the old BusHitler chestnut was the same thing.
Worst of all, he could not conceive of how ordinary people would be against a policy that will deprive them of their choice, their money and, very possibly, their health and life. In his mind, as in Barry’s, there is no counter-argument.
And this is the problem. For socialists, there is never another side to the story. I accept that other people have different opinions to mine, but I dislike that these views are often uninformed. For those on the Left, it is far easier – they simply resent each and every divergent view.
This is a necessity for them. There is no logic, no evidence, no intelligence behind any of their proposals. In the absence of anything to support their views, the only path open to socialists to defend their actions is to take offense at being disagreed with and quickly proceed to slander their opponents. They cannot argue persuasively on the issue itself, so they argue with the person.
Conservative are confident enough in their own values that disagreement will not shatter their fragile world view. But liberals are not. Hence the jolly game of let’s call conservatives “racists”, “fascists” and “fear-mongers” every time that they oppose anything put forward by The One.
Unfortunately, just as there will always be stupid people, so will there always be a stupid party to represent them.