Track-A-’Crat: The Roll Call of Democratic Delinquency

Due to unprecedented reader demand (well, one reader who emailed me, at least), here is the gallery of TIME covers featuring the 43rd president.

And, conforming nicely to expectations, it is the Mr. Hyde of coverage compared to the Dr. Jekyll treatment given to his successor.

The difference, of course, being that Dubya’s tally appeared over a span of seven and a half years, whereas Barry’s have been concentrated into three years.  In addition to the fact that Dubya will only make intermittent appearances from now on to distract from Barry’s ongoing clusterf*cks, while The One has years – nay, decades - of sycophantic coverage left to run.

Plus TIME is so far up Barry’s a*s with every single one of those covers that they can see daylight out the other end, with the Bush covers being almost equally consistent in their condescension.

If TIME were a person, I would very much like to skin it alive.

I wish that I could wish Ebola upon Time Magazine.

But, it not being a person, I cannot.  So the next best thing is to hope for a complete and imminent collapse of the sordid publication.

In 2008, Barack Obama graced the cover of TIME 16 times.  Seeing as TIME’s a weekly publication, that means that Obama featured on almost one-third of its covers in 2008.

Whereas John McCain made the cover six whole times (four of which were shared) in 2008.

But they’ve let things slip in 2009 – The One has only been on TIME’s cover four times so far this year, plus one appearance for wifey.  Best get on that right away, TIME.

As is so mind-numbingly clear, the Obamas are a license to print money.

And the MSM will not let its golden goose be harmed.

UPDATE: For a gallery of TIME Magazine’s unwavering and sycophantic devotion to President Obama, please click here.  Consider yourselves forewarned.

I guess it’s understandable enough – it’s not often that gods choose to walk among men anymore…

If your circulation is sinking, do you:

A) Broaden your articles and views to attract new readers?

B) Embark upon an aggressive publicity blitz?

C) Ride the coattails of an extremely popular president, with the additional hope that he may then throw a few stimulus $ your way?

I’ll take C, Pat, C!

Yup, the easiest option is always the best, isn’t it?  And the path of least resistance also allows for the publication of cringe-worthy pieces of alleged “journalism” like this.

There has surely been no grander revelation in recent memory than that.

It’s so bad that I’m embarrassed for them.