Eliot Spitzer, aka Mr. Ethics
November 16th, 2009
If Eliot Spitzer were a Republican, he would be such a wreck of a man after the media had got through with him that he would be afraid of even flushing the john, out of fear that someone would delve into the waste to see what could be divined from it.
Every aspect of his life would have been publicly excoriated, and the public would have been whipped into a frenzy such that only bloodshed would satisfy.
But he’s not a Republican. He’s a member of the party that can do no wrong, whose followers automatically receive a pass from the media, which then embarks on an all-out assault to convince the public that they’re deserving of clemency.
The flawless anti-logic of the Left, which demands that no-one be judged by any moral standard whatsoever (as that would undoubtedly be biased, prejudiced, racist or imperialist), leads to such common sense tsunamis as having someone such as Spitzer lecture on ethics. The reasoning goes something like this: because he admitted his guilt (once caught), he’s then well placed to reflect on his failings and help us simple folk avoid such pitfalls, right?
WRONG. I don’t want advice from an abortionist on how to raise babies, and I don’t want advice from politicians on ethical matters. In fact, they’re even less qualified than Spitzer to harangue us (if that’s possible. Is it?), as the only difference between them is that they’ve yet to be caught doing something massively wrong and hypocritical.
The madam who set Spitzer up with his, ahem, “high-class” (I think that’s a euphemism for “expensive”) hookers has written an awesomely scathing letter about Spitzer’s inappropriateness for anything involving right/wrong.
Plus: did he really take $9 million in illegal loans from daddy in order to fund two campaigns for Attorney General?
Boy, do I want bad things to happen to this king douche.
3 Comments | 
Eliot Spitzer | 
Permalink
Posted by Track-A-'Crat
