“You heard me, this woman does not even know that you exist and if she did I doubt she’d even care.”

That is, in fact, the whole point about this elitist, nouveau-riche social climber named Michelle Obama. Like her predecessor, Mrs. Bill Clinton, she thinks who she is. She is enamored of herself, and anybody who is beneath her on the totem pole (oops, is that a racist metaphor?) is discardable. Hillary had a reputation for being condescending and mean to White House staff. The Laura Bush, in contrast, was known to be respectful and friendly toward them. Which category do you think Michelle falls into?

P.s. Cover up those legs.
desman´s last blog ..Just Words

While he is not the gentleman that RayGun is, to be fair, he is literate and coherent — except for the dubious proposition of backing a mean-spirited, hateful, scheming, hyper-political woman.

But you and your loyal and agressive followers have put so many rounds on target, that he may not wander into this sector again for fear of drawing fire.

By the way, just as S.Weasel is known for her over-the-edge art work and witty, fringe commentary, your site to me is becoming *the* premier place to catch up on the antics of our beloved FLOTUS.

Keep it coming! The pics are priceless!
Войска ПВО´s last blog ..Semper Fi!

Will jjb respond?

jjb, you ignorant, pathetic, particle of bull excrement.

While it is noble of you to back Michelle Obama, your defenses of her are perfidious and just flat out miss the point of the witty and piquant fun poked at her by ‘Cat and the others here.

Firstly, the general rule is that a POTUS’s (even this POSOTUS’s) family is generally out-of-bounds as targets unless they specifically involve themselves in the all_too_public spectacle of politics. The FLOTUS has done that both by her utterances and her sadly inappropriate behavior. It began, most probably, with that incredible insensitive remark she made about finally being proud of her country after the Kool-Aid drinkers and other delusional members of the Pantload-in-Chief’s nascent following were duped into anointing this empty suit as the candidate for the office of president.

Hello?

This singlehanded destroyer black women negative is not proud of a country for having given access top a fine education because of their prejudicial view of her qualifications, i.e., being a black woman as opposed to a poor or middle-class white male. It also awarded a degree to her authoring a 95-page paper, possibly one of the more vapid of recitations on institutionalized racism; hardly a landmark document on the subject and clearly something she just jotted down.

Upon leaving She left Princeton and got handed the obligatory free pass to, of course, Harvard Law and another gimme degree and another free pass to a Chicago law firm (where she met The Pantload). Of course, she was probably not proud of the fact that there was a controversy swirling around her membership in the Illinois bar, but I am surprised that she is not bursting with pride over the loot that she, as a poor, underprivileged black women, was able to Hoover out of the U of C hospital and serving on the board of Treehouse foods.

You see, you grape juice drinking cretin, that’s the whole point: while her husband is the first black president, she is arguably the first black Marie Antoinette, unceasingly engaging in her “let them eat cake” moments on an almost daily basis.

So, we here find your defensive screed in aid of the broad-butted, vicious, mean-spirited woman to be of almost equal entertainment for its insensitivity and tone deafness. I guess the only thing that could be more humorous would be if you donned some $500 sneakers, carried a $6,000 purse, and wore those ugly shorts and atrocious tops on Air Force One..

..even if you are a man.
Войска ПВО´s last blog ..Friday the 13th

It’s called projection – look it up.

Don’t presume to know what I think; you know nothing about me. This blog and others like it exist because we, as a group, as interested in politics and current events. Because we believe we have a voice – certainly the First Amendment to the Constitution (familiar with that?) guarantees us the right to our voice.

We believe in a future for this country that does not include the socialist policies of Obama. He could be chartreuse and I’d still feel the same way; he could be lily white (and indeed, half of him is) and I’d still feel the same way.

What about that concept do you people not understand? It isn’t always about race; sometimes it’s about brains, policies and ethics.

No one here is shutting you down; you are the troll attempting to shut down the voices on this blog.

Put on your big boy pants and deal with it. We don’t like Obama – and we aren’t racists.
Kris, in New England´s last blog ..The Waiting Game – At Grave Expense

Kris, astute observation.

jjb – you will not find a racist post or comment in the entirety of this blog. I, along with everyone else here, oppose Barry for being an unrepentant, indoctrinaire socialist.

The rapidity with which you and others of you ilk slander conservatives with the racism charge every time that we dare to oppose the 44th president reveals nothing other than your own profound intolerance and ignorance.

But you are still welcome here. You may learn something, if only by osmosis.

PS – Please consult RayGun on the proper trolling etiquette. He’ll show you the way.