<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Read It And Weep, Obots</title>
	<atom:link href="http://trackacrat.com/2009/11/03/read-it-and-weep-obots/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://trackacrat.com/2009/11/03/read-it-and-weep-obots/</link>
	<description>The Roll Call of Democratic Delinquency</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 23:42:56 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Track-A-'Crat</title>
		<link>http://trackacrat.com/2009/11/03/read-it-and-weep-obots/comment-page-1/#comment-7881</link>
		<dc:creator>Track-A-'Crat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:02:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trackacrat.com/?p=5582#comment-7881</guid>
		<description>Voyska - love the phrase &quot;slipping orbits like an erratic electron&quot;, and your concise round-up of who makes up the whopping 26 percent &quot;strongly support&quot; category (morons, all).

Sandy - bitter/sweet defined.

madmath - you got it. The questions were obviously phrased wrong and the number of syllables/rhythm of the words must have pre-disposed the participants against Obama. Of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Voyska &#8211; love the phrase &#8220;slipping orbits like an erratic electron&#8221;, and your concise round-up of who makes up the whopping 26 percent &#8220;strongly support&#8221; category (morons, all).</p>
<p>Sandy &#8211; bitter/sweet defined.</p>
<p>madmath &#8211; you got it. The questions were obviously phrased wrong and the number of syllables/rhythm of the words must have pre-disposed the participants against Obama. Of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: madmath1</title>
		<link>http://trackacrat.com/2009/11/03/read-it-and-weep-obots/comment-page-1/#comment-7854</link>
		<dc:creator>madmath1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 00:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trackacrat.com/?p=5582#comment-7854</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m shocked that Rasmussen would publish such unfavorable numbers for the one.  Watch out!  I&#039;m sure the White House will properly reprimand them and rephrase the question like the gays in the military that showed 80% of Americans were against the ban.  Turns out the question was &quot;Are you a bigot?&quot;.  When people said no, they made that a vote for the end of the ban (what&#039;s shocking is 20% said yes and I&#039;ll bet those were liberals like blacks and latinos where being a bigot is a good thing).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m shocked that Rasmussen would publish such unfavorable numbers for the one.  Watch out!  I&#8217;m sure the White House will properly reprimand them and rephrase the question like the gays in the military that showed 80% of Americans were against the ban.  Turns out the question was &#8220;Are you a bigot?&#8221;.  When people said no, they made that a vote for the end of the ban (what&#8217;s shocking is 20% said yes and I&#8217;ll bet those were liberals like blacks and latinos where being a bigot is a good thing).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandy in Indiana</title>
		<link>http://trackacrat.com/2009/11/03/read-it-and-weep-obots/comment-page-1/#comment-7847</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandy in Indiana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 21:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trackacrat.com/?p=5582#comment-7847</guid>
		<description>Obama&#039;s approval numbers are beginning to resemble my portfolio.  Arrrrrrrrgggggghhhhhh!!!!!!!
.-= Sandy in Indiana´s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://insanehousewifeclub.blogspot.com/2009/11/november-3-2009-elections.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;November 3, 2009 Elections&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama&#8217;s approval numbers are beginning to resemble my portfolio.  Arrrrrrrrgggggghhhhhh!!!!!!!<br />
<span class="cluv"> Sandy in Indiana´s last blog ..<a href="http://insanehousewifeclub.blogspot.com/2009/11/november-3-2009-elections.html" rel="nofollow">November 3, 2009 Elections</a> </span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Войска ПВО</title>
		<link>http://trackacrat.com/2009/11/03/read-it-and-weep-obots/comment-page-1/#comment-7836</link>
		<dc:creator>Войска ПВО</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 18:14:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trackacrat.com/?p=5582#comment-7836</guid>
		<description>Track and assembled throng of Obama &quot;well-wishers&quot;, you will note that he is &lt;a href=&quot;http://voyskapvo.blogspot.com/2009/10/coming-soon-s-feeble-attempt-to.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&quot;slipping orbits&quot;&lt;/a&gt; like an erratic electron. His current Rasmussen strongly is a pair o&#039; minus thirteens and the trend indicates a downward spiral. If you examine the explanation by Rasmussen, you will note that the &quot;strongly&quot; categories is defined as those who would actively do something to either support or oppose Obama. Also, when you get down to 26% that&#039;s pretty much absolute zero for Pantload-in-Chief lovers. I mean that&#039;s Union thugs, illegal aliens, minorities throwing him the obligatory vote because they want their mortgage paid, the no-tax-paying &quot;gimme&quot; crowd, and stars-in-their-eyes &quot;Yutes&quot; still in college who think the world should be one big commie funk-fest. I don&#039;t think it&#039;ll go much below 25% from now on unless he pisses them off.

But the 40% strongly disapprove can take a heap more out of those who just disapprove: old people who start adding up what this idiot&#039;s healthscare crap is going to cost and people who don&#039;t have their eye on the ball until they get whacked in the ribs.

Also, if you go over to RealClearPolitics.com and look at their summaries of other polls, you will note that not only are the other services trending down, but the internals and tangential referenda are shelling out. While CNN reports the POSOTUS has &lt;a href=&quot;http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/03/cnn-poll-54-disapprove-of-obama-economic-performance/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;a favorable number&lt;/a&gt; the actual numbers on how the pipples feel about his performance is hollowing out (emphasis added):

&lt;i&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;In fact, it’s hard to find an issue where Obama has not lost ground:
Economy – 46%/54%, was 54%/45%
Foreign affairs – 51%/47%, was 58%/38%
Health care – 42%/57%, was 51%/47%
Afghanistan – 42%/56%, was 49%/46%
Taxes – 49%/50%, was 52%/42%
Helping the middle class – 50%/49%, was 67%/32% (six months ago, last time question asked)

His numbers stayed roughly the same on Medicare, with just a rounding difference.  Otherwise, Obama has lost serious ground on every issue, mainly over the last six weeks. &lt;b&gt;On health care, Obama is close to entering Bush territory in terms of job approval, but one would never know that from CNN’s reporting on its own poll.&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/i&gt;

In short: it sucks to be him.
.-= Войска ПВО´s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://voyskapvo.blogspot.com/2009/11/nations-gym-bag-wasting-away.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Nation&#039;s Gym Bag wasting away..&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Track and assembled throng of Obama &#8220;well-wishers&#8221;, you will note that he is <a href="http://voyskapvo.blogspot.com/2009/10/coming-soon-s-feeble-attempt-to.html" rel="nofollow">&#8220;slipping orbits&#8221;</a> like an erratic electron. His current Rasmussen strongly is a pair o&#8217; minus thirteens and the trend indicates a downward spiral. If you examine the explanation by Rasmussen, you will note that the &#8220;strongly&#8221; categories is defined as those who would actively do something to either support or oppose Obama. Also, when you get down to 26% that&#8217;s pretty much absolute zero for Pantload-in-Chief lovers. I mean that&#8217;s Union thugs, illegal aliens, minorities throwing him the obligatory vote because they want their mortgage paid, the no-tax-paying &#8220;gimme&#8221; crowd, and stars-in-their-eyes &#8220;Yutes&#8221; still in college who think the world should be one big commie funk-fest. I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;ll go much below 25% from now on unless he pisses them off.</p>
<p>But the 40% strongly disapprove can take a heap more out of those who just disapprove: old people who start adding up what this idiot&#8217;s healthscare crap is going to cost and people who don&#8217;t have their eye on the ball until they get whacked in the ribs.</p>
<p>Also, if you go over to RealClearPolitics.com and look at their summaries of other polls, you will note that not only are the other services trending down, but the internals and tangential referenda are shelling out. While CNN reports the POSOTUS has <a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/03/cnn-poll-54-disapprove-of-obama-economic-performance/" rel="nofollow">a favorable number</a> the actual numbers on how the pipples feel about his performance is hollowing out (emphasis added):</p>
<p><i><br />
<blockquote>In fact, it’s hard to find an issue where Obama has not lost ground:<br />
Economy – 46%/54%, was 54%/45%<br />
Foreign affairs – 51%/47%, was 58%/38%<br />
Health care – 42%/57%, was 51%/47%<br />
Afghanistan – 42%/56%, was 49%/46%<br />
Taxes – 49%/50%, was 52%/42%<br />
Helping the middle class – 50%/49%, was 67%/32% (six months ago, last time question asked)</p>
<p>His numbers stayed roughly the same on Medicare, with just a rounding difference.  Otherwise, Obama has lost serious ground on every issue, mainly over the last six weeks. <b>On health care, Obama is close to entering Bush territory in terms of job approval, but one would never know that from CNN’s reporting on its own poll.</b></p></blockquote>
<p></i></p>
<p>In short: it sucks to be him.<br />
<span class="cluv"> Войска ПВО´s last blog ..<a href="http://voyskapvo.blogspot.com/2009/11/nations-gym-bag-wasting-away.html" rel="nofollow">Nation&#8217;s Gym Bag wasting away..</a> </span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
