• Home
  • Blogroll
  • Contact
  • Newsweek ♡♡♡ Obama
  • TIME ♡♡♡ Obama
  •  

    Hot Mormon Muffins

    Jeez, women can make anything enticing.

    I mean, if a hot enough woman told me to rub chili peppers into my eyes or eat a Twix that had been dunked in a urinal, I’d do it with a smile.

    Still, I can’t imagine that the Mormon Church is too thrilled about the existence of Hot Mormon Muffins calendars and other assorted goods.  The guy who came up with this brainwave – Chad Hardy – was ex- communicated from the Mormon Church for his male Mormon calendar in 2007, so he obviously figures that he’s got the punishment out of the way already (although he seems to be overlooking the possibility of being condemned to Hell by Mormon Elders, which would, admittedly, be kinda harsh simply for producing an awesome calendar of Mormon hotties – surely he’s doing them a favor?).

    But you’ve got to wonder: are these people really Mormons?  ‘Cos I could claim to be one, then do something like this and sit back while the riches (and hate mail) pour in.

    I’d guess that they’re probably about as Mormon as Pelosi is Catholic.

    Still, let’s focus on the good: hot chicks + muffins.

    Unbeatable.

    • Share/Bookmark

    Kinda Similar Posts (Perhaps)

    21 Responses to “Hot Mormon Muffins”

    1. kireinaNo Gravatar Says:

      So, I guess being female means that, instead of focusing on the HAWT aspects here, I have problems with reality gaps. For example, she’s wearing an oven mitt, indicating the pan is, say, hot, but she’s holding the bottom of the pan with her bare hand, *and* she’s licking the muffin pan. How are third degree burns hawt again?

    2. LibertarianAdvocateNo Gravatar Says:

      I think that qualifies for a Rule 5 credit.
      LibertarianAdvocate´s last blog ..CAGW OCTOBER 2009 PORKER OF THE MONTH: KAY BAILEY HUTCHISON

    3. ArbyNo Gravatar Says:

      And, the muffins have not fallen out of the pan. They just kinds stick out. Are they real? Are her muffins naturally that large, or are they enhanced?
      Arby´s last blog ..Wii are Finished with the Contest

    4. Track-A-'CratNo Gravatar Says:

      Tch, tch. A little suspension of imagination is required!

      But I like your eagle-eyed dissection of the photo-fakery, kireina. Although women have a higher pain threshold than cry-baby men, so maybe she’s just suffering for the sake of beauty, as ladies so often do.

      Hadn’t thought of that, LA, but am gonna submit it now to The Other McCain.

      Arby, they’re just good, sticky muffins, is all. And I reckon that her sweater puppies are real, particularly compared to this pair (don’t worry, the pic is SFW – well, just about, considering who the subject is).

    5. democratsarefascistsNo Gravatar Says:

      Nothing attached to Amy Winehouse counts as real.

      She’s ninety percent alcohol and illicit drugs. The rest is silicone, with some stupidity in the form of plasma.

    6. RayGunNo Gravatar Says:

      Regarding this post, I thought cons were all prudes and liked telling others what to do, and believed in do as I say, not as I do. What gives?

      Pretty soon you are all going to tell people to quit telling others what to do, and the cognitive dissonance will destroy us all.

      GD after a few beers, I crack myself up :-)

      I am so glad back in the 20s, when you cons outlawed booze, it didn’t stick.

    7. KingShamusNo Gravatar Says:

      Best. Mormon. Muffin Calendar. EVAH.
      KingShamus´s last blog ..Hey, anybody want yet another heavy-handed Iraq War movie?

    8. skiri'kiNo Gravatar Says:

      Ha! “sweater puppies”! ROFLMFAO! I have never heard that term before. OMG, that’s hysterical. Heh, heh, he said sweater puppies!

    9. RayGunNo Gravatar Says:

      “Ha! “sweater puppies”!”

      That was pretty good, I must admit also.

    10. Войска ПВОNo Gravatar Says:

      Ray, old son,

      When the buzz wears off, I suggest you check out your history — particularly those responsible for prohibition. It seems that both parties (Republican and Democrat) were equally responsible for this frivolous waste of resources:

      “In the 1916 presidential election, both Democratic incumbent Woodrow Wilson and Republican candidate Charles Evans Hughes ignored the Prohibition issue, as was the case with both parties’ political platforms. Democrats and Republicans had strong wet and dry factions, and the election was expected to be close, with neither candidate wanting to alienate any part of his political base.

      In January 1917, the 65th Congress convened, in which the dries outnumbered the wets by 140 to 64 in the Democratic party and 138 to 62 among Republicans. With America’s declaration of war against Germany in April, German-Americans—a major force against prohibition—were widely discredited and their protests subsequently ignored.”

      That notwithstanding, you ought to get down on your knees and thank the Good Lord that the Volstead Act was passed. It made Joe Kennedy — then a rum runner — into a wealthy mand and head of a very powerful family. Of course, he than catapaulted his three sons into politics.

      So have one on me.
      Войска ПВО´s last blog ..Governator to San Francisco: Foxtrot Uniform Charlie Kilo..

    11. WriterXNo Gravatar Says:

      I’m not sure if licking a hot muffin pan is a good idea. Hadn’t seen this, though. Thanks for the laugh. :-)
      WriterX´s last blog ..140. Are You Smarter Than a 5th Grader?

    12. ArbyNo Gravatar Says:

      Ray, the things that you do not know would fill volumes…
      Arby´s last blog ..Where Are Your Clothes, Little Girl?

    13. Track-A-'CratNo Gravatar Says:

      Glad y’all liked “sweater puppies” – wasn’t sure if I was perhaps pushing acceptable boundaries with that one. Gotta keep it (mostly) suitable for all ages, don’t you know.

      Writer X – you’re more than welcome, I’ll stop by your site this afternoon.

      democratsarefascists – never has there been a more accurate analysis of Amy Winehouse.

      Voyska – good knowledge, great riposte!

      I am curious, Ray, as to what keeps on bringing you back here. I welcome your visits and comments, make no mistake, and am glad that it’s all remained civil so far. It’s also a sign of open-mindedness on your part, as people rarely choose to keep on doing something voluntarily that they don’t enjoy. I’ve trolled some Left-wing sites, but the amusement wears off fast. Neither do you come here solely to kick up a fuss, or else you would be posting more provocative, if not offensive, comments – which you haven’t been doing.

      So could it perhaps be that, on some level, you recognize some sense in the posts and comments herein? If not about the benefits of conservatism, then about the shortcomings of the Left and its elected representatives, at least?

      Time to ‘fess up, my man.

    14. BobGNo Gravatar Says:

      As someone who has lived in Salt Lake for over fifty years (I am not Mormon, though), those could very well be Mormon women. There are a lot of stereotypes and false information out there about Utah. The media only shows a couple of facets about the people here.

    15. Track-A-'CratNo Gravatar Says:

      BobG – yep, it would take a little more effort to portray things accurately instead of fostering stereotypes, but the media is averse to anything that requires them not to type in automatic mode.

      Utah’s a treasure trove of pretty gals, then. Must be all that clean living. Romney – not a gal, I know – looks hideously good for a 62-year old.

    16. skiri'kiNo Gravatar Says:

      He’s 62? Wow, had no idea. Hhhmmm, been thinking about a move westward. Kick-a$$ mtbing in that region. Moab is there. Not that I’m anywhere near 62, as y’all can tell by my comments. ;)

    17. RayGunNo Gravatar Says:

      Regarding Prohibition:

      “Prohibition was demanded by the “dries” — primarily pietistic Protestant denominations, especially the Methodists, Northern Baptists, Southern Baptists, Presbyterians, Disciples of Christ, Congregationalists, Quakers, and Scandinavian Lutherans.”

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prohibition_in_the_United_States

      And we know which party owns God :-) And we all know libs (I am an independent) don’t really believe in God. So you can see my reasons for assigning blame to the cons for prohibition.

    18. RayGunNo Gravatar Says:

      “Time to ‘fess up, my man.”

      I’ll fess to this. RayGun was right for the times, but the times have changed. Bush the wiser and Ford were fine also. I would of voted for all 3.

      Bush the dumber and Palin and Bachmann and similar cons, scare the BeJeezus out of me when I think of the destruction they did and could cause respectively.

    19. BobGNo Gravatar Says:

      You need to study history, RayGun. A good proportion of those groups, just like the majority of the KKK, were predominantly democrat at that time.
      BobG´s last blog ..Winter has come to visit

    20. StephanieNo Gravatar Says:

      Great comment BobG. The women have said they did the calender because they wanted to break the stereotypes. http://www.newsy.com/videos/calendar_puts_mormons_in_hot_water

    21. Bob BelvedereNo Gravatar Says:

      Linked to [finally!] at:
      TIME TO BUY THOSE 2010 CALENDARS…
      Bob Belvedere´s last blog ..AT THE POINT OF A GUN

    Leave a Reply

    CommentLuv Enabled
    Please visit WP-Admin > Options > Snap Shots and enter the Snap Shots key. How to find your key